The era of digital copying of the dead is coming

 Modern technology and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) open up new possibilities, including the concept of "digital cloning" of the deceased. This raises many questions about ethics, law and society's willingness to accept such advanced technologies. Study conducted by Dr. Masaki Iwasaki from Seoul National University shed light on public perception of this phenomenon.

Dr. Iwasaki surveyed 222 American adults, presenting them with a scenario in which the family and friends of a tragically deceased woman consider recreating her as a digital android. The study found a significant difference in the acceptance of digital cloning, depending on whether the person consented to it while alive. As many as 97% of respondents were against the idea of digital resurrection without the consent of the deceased person, while 58% accepted it if the deceased gave consent.

Despite its technological possibilities, digital cloning remains highly controversial. About 59% of respondents disagreed with the possibility of their own digital cloning after death, and 40% considered it socially unacceptable under any circumstances. These results highlight the complex nature of the issue, combining ethical issues, life and death, and concerns about new technologies.

Digital clones already exist in various forms, from Einstein-style AI to recreations of Darth Vader's voice. Recently, the topic of debate in Hollywood has been the use of artificial intelligence to "resurrect" dead movie stars. This shows that this technology is gradually entering our everyday lives.

Dr. Iwasaki notes the need for more research to understand public sentiment and protect people's rights. He suggests introducing legal regulations, such as the opt-in principle, requiring the consent of the deceased for their digital rebirth. This approach can help ensure that the technology is used ethically and with respect for individual rights.

Digital cloning opens up many possibilities, but at the same time raises a number of ethical and legal questions. Society must come to grips with the implications of this technology, considering both the rights of the dead and the impact on the living.