Saturday, April 29, 2023

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CROSS ANOTHER BARRIERS!

 Artificial intelligence (AI) can already generate (produce) graphics, photos, design design, fashion, and art. He composes music, voice recordings, videos, and various, even very sophisticated fakes.

➡️ This results in threats that are not related to her taking over the world and destroying humanity. Many of us are not even aware of these dangers. In this text, I will list some of the most important and at the same time little-known ones that will probably interest you.

🔥 Threats related to the development of artificial intelligence (AI):

Imagine a foreign intelligence agency producing a very realistic AI interview with one of the supervisory board members of a bank located in a hostile country. In this fake interview, the man admits that he could no longer watch what the management at his facility was doing. Therefore, he fled to a distant country, where he seeks asylum. He also intends, and how, to tell the truth. According to this artificial figure, the bank is already on the verge of bankruptcy, it has accumulated a lot of financial instruments that are toxic or junk value. Liabilities granted for mortgages are also beginning to be unpayable. Of course, bad management is supposed to hide it as much as possible.

What happens next? A scandal breaks out, the subject is picked up by the stick-quality, but very popular tabloids, and with it also some of the more "serious" media. Small shareholders investing their capital on the stock exchanges withdraw two shares in a panic (e.g. shares), followed by big fish of the financiers, sometimes turning hundreds of billions of dollars. And indeed there is a crash, the bank becomes insolvent and goes bankrupt, and with it a number of smaller banks. Further escalation of this crisis is possible, e.g. the collapse of a large number of banks, the weakening of the currency of the attacked country, or huge drops on its stock exchange, echoing in various enterprises. And then everyone, because there is an increase in inflation and an increase in interest rates.

Such a collapse may, according to the domino effect, have a global dimension, then it is likely to ruin the economies of the EU, USA, GB, Australia, Japan, South Korea, South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, and Mexico. The economies of countries like China will do better because they have human and productive resources, as does Russia, which has the capacity to produce large amounts of military equipment, a whole lot of cannon fodder which then poses a real famine, and reasonably good agriculture.

A possible world war would then be a much greater challenge for NATO and the West.

  Every message, graphic or video seen on the net can be suspected of being a fake created or at least tweaked by AI. People will stop trusting anything they see or hear.

There will be a collective schizophrenia in which society will become totally distrustful of information streams. And as a result - it will also become more rebellious, the level of general aggression will increase.

Or otherwise ... When there is a recording of politicians eating octopus and talking about making ice cream for VAT or carrying clutch bags in plastic bags ... It's obedient to international financiers The official media will immediately start an assault campaign that it's fake AI.

When a recording comes out that after working hours in a local bar, an employee of some company turned out to be dishonest and boasted about selling data to the competition, it may be argued that this is a false recording created by AI on behalf of his enemy, who is in this company in general disliked.

And on the other hand, anyone from a pimply teenager immersed in the world of tiktak to the head of an international corporation can be discredited by creating appropriate material against him. In the era of the so-called "Kancel Culture", this is particularly important.

Thirdly, billions of monitoring cameras, e.g. in the city, in public transport, or in enterprises, are still based on cheap technology, and the image itself is of rather poor quality (outside China). For example, if the son of a local oligarch with ties to the local government, politicians, businesses, underworld people, celebrities, clergy, and officials commits some crime that was recorded by the city camera.

Total destruction of trust for people you meet online. You made friends with such a person, or sparks started to fly between you. You exchanged various photos and videos, including your own. It's also possible that you've had hours of live video chatting via Messenger.

You make an appointment but in the meantime…

… This person could have been an artificial AI-generated creation from beginning to end, including live video calls.

So you stand in front of a bunch of kidnappers or enemies who want to kick you, or a bunch of idiots who want fame in ridiculing others.

Be handsome with your own yacht and motor boats, turns out to be ugly or average who showed up at the meeting place to record you live and discredit you.

Or it could be a degenerate who makes you fall in love with him and then disappears without a trace, leaving you shocked, traumatized and heartbroken.

CAUSES OF EXPENSIVE IN STORES

 WHY IS THIS EXPENSIVE ⁉️ EXPLANATION:

1 ️⃣ government social programs and an increase in the minimum wage have a small or even negligible impact on inflation.

2 ️⃣ printing money by the national bank has a greater impact on inflation, but still small.

💥 WHO IS THE MOST RESPONSIBLE FOR INFLATION AND EXPENSIVENESS?

3 ️⃣ Mostly private banks do it every time they grant credits and loans. The bank, in order to give you a loan, cannot withdraw money because it does not have any. It has to create artificial money (out of thin air), because it can, and you have to give it back from the money generated in the real economy.

4 ️⃣ Did you know that the price of potatoes depends not on how many we collect in a given year ... but on the valuation of financial instruments for potatoes and the agricultural industry in general on the Wall Street or Amsterdam stock exchanges?

Investors, small and large, buy shares of various companies or various financial-like (speculative) instruments with the intention of getting rich. So prices necessarily have to rise constantly, and when the speculative bubble bursts, they must fall temporarily. Further increases follow.

Stock exchanges are a very toxic, neoliberal mechanism that allows a few investment consortia to siphon money and resources from around the globe (read about the real owners of planet Earth - BlackRock and Vanguard).

what's happening here?

 Am I the only one who sees that all this is not only somewhat, to put it mildly, "strange", but it is slowly starting to come together?

➡️ Cholera and Ebola are spreading in Africa. In the USA and Europe, record numbers of cases of a dangerous type of fungus Candida Auris, pneumonia lasting for weeks, streptococcal infections, norovirus. The increase in HIV incidence among humans is absolutely record-breaking, and populations of wild (and farmed) birds are literally being massacred by bird flu, which has already begun to attack forest mammals. Only a few unfortunate mutations separate us from the jump to humans.

Since 2020, the incidence of infectious diseases, but also mental or cardiological ones, has skyrocketed. It can no longer be covered up. And this applies both to those who were "stung" and to those who avoided the "sting." I wasn't stung or even tested for KNOWN WHAT. And yet, I also struggle with various infections (recently, shingles + otitis media, it gave me a hard time). I have observed that it doesn't matter if there was a sting or not - people get sick en masse!

➡️ Is it possible that a "mean troublemaker" escaped from some laboratory, specially tuned by geneticists to destroy the immune system even after asymptomatic illness, causing an AIDS-like disease, plus to attach to receptors that are throughout the body (ACE ), causing the "mean troublemaker" to aggravate any existing disease and damage any previously weakened organ?

ATTENTION, the above is not some strange "theory", but in this, 2023, it was officially confirmed by the US FBI. The problem is, they don't talk about it on TV, so you don't know about it.

➡️ So, in our language, we can have a significant over-mortality in the next 20-40 years, i.e. removing from the group of living pensioners and chronically ill people, and genetically weaker.

How to escape East Berlin? Review of Helena Merriman's book "Tunnel 29"

 For many, the Berlin Wall is one of the most important symbols of the Cold War. It divided Europe into two completely different worlds. Helena Merriman tells the stories of people who have experienced this tear firsthand.

On August 13, 1961, Berliners woke up in a city divided by a wall. Although it had been the subject of disputes between the West and the Soviet Union since the end of the war until then it had been easy to get to the West. Many people took advantage of this and freely moved to the more affluent and free part of the city.

The East German authorities initially believed that the citizens could be retained with a vision of a bright future. It turned out to be impossible, socialism did not live up to its promises, and "Europe's most American city" (West Berlin) struck the eyes of the inhabitants of the unleavened, eastern part. The more so that after Stalin's death, the Stalinist regime did not ease at all. The mass exodus began to threaten not only the reputation of the new system but also the economy of the GDR. Then the leader of the state - Walter Ulbricht - decided to build a wall. The "Iron Curtain" that Winston Churchill spoke of 15 years earlier has become a fact.

Cut by a wall and a cordon of soldiers, Berlin - a city in the very center of Europe - was the most important flashpoint during the Cold War. This is the only such place, in a world dominated by two ideologically hostile superpowers, where citizens of both realities could see each other through the windows and over the stone wall of wall.

The East German authorities could not change the fact that the eyes of the international community were on this point. Despite attempts to completely cut off, brick windows and doors in tenement houses, and above all to build a heavily guarded wall, entanglements and guard towers, everything that happened on the border was closely watched. Journalists from West Berlin photographed and filmed escapes, people from East Berlin could see life on the other side with the naked eye or through binoculars. For the West, the wall was an expression of the failure of the communist utopia, proof of the internal weakness of the enemy, but in East Berlin, it was also read as a failure of the West.

The main axis of the book is the biography of one of the constructors of the title tunnel - Joachim Rudolf. After the border between East and West Berlin was closed, he developed an escape plan with a friend. He managed to get to West Berlin. Later that year, he joined a group that planned tunnels under the city and helped others escape.

Joachim is not the only hero of the story. The author brings closer the fate of people entangled in this strange political system. Escaping to the West was not just about crossing the border. There were those whom the secret services on both sides of the Iron Curtain tried to recruit or recruited. Many also died – killed by border guards or as a result of injuries, drownings, and other accidents. People jumped from the windows of tenement houses, jumped over barbed wire fences, broke through the wall, and tried to swim across the river. There have even been several attempts (some successful) to escape by balloon. There were also many attempts to escape through the tunnels. Not all of them turned out to be successful. The digging took a long time, and the inexperienced escapees were unable to protect the structure from flooding or collapsing.

Joachim and his colleagues set about a task in which they had no experience. Despite this, they managed to use the knowledge from engineering studies. Watching reports of failed and collapsed tunnels on television, they also tried not to repeat the mistakes of others. It wasn't entirely without problems. The first tunnel 29 had to be abandoned due to a pipe leak. They also met with betrayal, and one of the participants ended up in prison on the eastern side for two years.

However, the work of students building a passage near Berlin was publicized in the West. Who financed the construction of the tunnel? How did the fate of the heroes go? Everything the reader will learn from Merriman's book.

"Tunnel 29" is not only fictionalized biography of Berliners fleeing to the West. The author placed the whole thing in a broader historical context. Readers will learn about the most important officials, the circumstances surrounding the creation of the wall, and the working methods of the infamous STASI secret police. They will learn about the relations between the US and the USSR and what role the events that took place in Berlin played.

A story told in very colorful language. Personal experiences and memories are presented in a tangible amount of detail. At the same time, it is a book of high substantive value, full of reliable information and true testimonies.

"Tunnel 29" is a fascinating story about ordinary people in extraordinary circumstances who outsmarted the regime of Walter Ulbricht. It is also a story about a city that found itself in the center of Cold War rivalry. It was both the most heavily guarded and the weakest point separating the East from the West. KronikiDziejow.pl is the media patron of the book.

***

Helena Merriman is an award-winning British journalist. She worked as a foreign correspondent in many places around the world, including Egypt, Jerusalem, Washington. She reported on such events as the uprising in Cairo, protests in Yemen and the resistance movement in Libya. "Tunnel 29" was initially created in the form of a 10-episode podcast broadcast on the BBC Radio 4 channel. It has reached 3 million listeners and gained a wide audience around the world. The book was first published in English in 2021.

Wednesday, April 19, 2023

April Blog- random thoughts

 It is worth paying attention to an interesting issue that is rarely mentioned. Take, for example, such an outstanding scientist as Stephen Hawking was undoubted. Physicist, cosmologist, author of many works and books. We will certainly agree that someone with such a brilliant mind will give us a matter-of-fact opinion on the burning issue of whether Earth could be visited by aliens potentially responsible for some UFO sightings. Well, in 2008, during a TED Talk, Professor Stephen Hawking expressed the following opinion:

"Aliens don't seem to be visiting us. UFO reports aside. Why would they only appear to freaks and freaks?"

In other words, Stephen Hawking didn't even consider reports of UFO sightings. Why would UFOs be observed exclusively by "freaks"? Observations are discarded in advance so as not to bother with them. At this point, it's worth asking yourself the following question - was Stephen Hawking right or wrong? Perhaps only 'freaks' report UFO sightings? Before expressing his opinion on such an interesting matter, Stephen Hawking certainly did the famous 'research' after which he was tempted to make such a strong statement. Well, he didn't.

First, in 1975, physics professor Peter Sturrock conducted a study among members of the American Astronomical Society. As it turned out, 5% of them had seen a UFO. Would Stephen Hawking describe them as 'freaks' and 'lunatics'? If so, it should also be used to describe at least two presidents of the United States - both Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan described having witnessed UFO sightings. However, UFO sightings were reported by a large number of military personnel, fighter pilots and airline pilots. If Stephen Hawking knew that some pilots of such planes reported UFO sightings, would he have labeled the pilots 'freaks' before boarding the plane?

Second, Stephen Hawking was able to peek at Project Blue Book data. This project was led by the United States Army, which was investigating UFOs. Special Report No. 14 of the Blue Book Project details where the UFO sightings come from and what their value is. Nowhere is it mentioned that 100% of the sightings come from 'lunatics'. On the contrary, analysts have classified many of the cases as 'excellent' in terms of quality, noting that the UFO observers were credible individuals, such as airline pilots or trained military personnel. Moreover, in the 'diagnosed' category, only 1.5% of cases were considered psychological or 'crazy' cases.

Stephen Hawking, however, was not interested in checking any data. Stephen Hawking did his 'own research' in that he didn't do it at all. If such absurd arguments are made by scientists of the caliber of Hawking, then there is a serious problem. Many people who are completely unfamiliar with the subject may take such words for granted. Let's put ourselves in the position of the average bread eater who thinks to himself: 'Oh, this famous Stephen Hawking rejects UFOs because only freaks can see them. He's probably right, but aliens don't visit us.' It is not difficult to understand why some people reject the topic of UFOs, since even such eminent scientists as Professor Stephen Hawking allowed themselves to be deceived here. It is easy to think that such a renowned physicist and cosmologist knows what he is talking about, and then to accept his opinion.

If we think about it for a moment, the whole thing is really astounding. How is it possible that a mind like Stephen Hawking, whom I'm sure all of you rightly respect, could be so easily deceived and led astray? Well, the fault lies on many sides. Probably all Hawking has heard about UFOs are a few sensational stories being circulated by the media, who like to focus on 'crazy' cases in an attempt to show that UFOs are being observed by madmen. The media likes to act this way according to the golden rule 'focus on the extreme and try to convince yourself that the extreme is the norm'. As you can see, the tactic is taking its toll, since it managed to deceive even the leading scientist of recent years. Not only do some average eaters of bread ignore UFO reports thinking that it is complete nonsense, the situation is similar in the case of scientists. Many of them have preconceived the opinion that there is nothing interesting in this, and therefore should be ignored, omitted any observations.

Let's take a second example. Josef Allen Hynek was a professor of astronomy who served as a scientific adviser to three US military UFO programs, most notably the aforementioned Blue Book Project. When the military hired him, Hynek was very skeptical about UFO reports. Hynek suspected that the sightings were made by unreliable witnesses or people who had misidentified man-made or natural objects. Josef Allen Hynek even said that "the whole subject seems completely absurd" and described it as "a fashion that will pass soon." However, in the course of many years of research, Hynek began to change his mind. In one famous statement, he said: 'Ricking is not part of the scientific method, and people should not be taught that it is. The constant stream of reports, often drawn up in concert by reliable observers, raises questions about scientific duty and responsibility.'

After much research, Hynek moved on to the camp considering the so-called the extraterrestrial hypothesis that alien spacecraft are responsible for some UFO sightings. In one of the interviews, Hynek drew attention to an interesting point, namely a conversation he had with another famous astronomer, Carl Sagan. Sagan had mixed feelings about UFOs, being skeptical about whether some of them were vehicles from outer space. As Hynek stated, Carl Sagan did not study UFOs at all. Hynek told of a situation when he and Sagan were together at Harvard University discussing UFOs. Sagan was very skeptical about the matter. In an interview, Hynek quotes the dialogue:

'I asked him what he thought about this particular case in New York. He had never heard of it. I asked him what he thought about this particular case in Wisconsin. He had never heard of it. I went on, case by case, case by case. Never heard of it, never studied it. Then I said: Carl, you know as well as I do that before a scientist talks about something, he should be familiar with the literature, he should research it. And he said yes, but I don't have time for that kind of thing.'

In other words, Carl Sagan did not have time to research and become familiar with the various UFO cases, but at the same time he found time for skeptical statements about the extraordinary nature of the phenomenon. Both of these cases, both of Hawking and Sagan, show us that even the most eminent scientists are willing to express their opinions without proper knowledge of the subject. This is because it is very easy to cross out the subject of UFOs in advance, indicating that one does not have time to check various cases, or that observers are just weirdos. Then many people listen to such statements and swallow them like young pelicans. Journalists uncritically reproduce such statements in the media, pointing out that they come from recognized scientists, and average people reading such materials form a similar opinion.

Christopher Mellon, former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, responsible for making three UFO recordings public in 2017, wrote in his article 'The Fermi Paradox Paradox':

'Unfortunately, the UFO stigma persists among many, perhaps most, scientists. Worse still, some scientists spread disinformation. For example, I was amazed to see prominent SETI researchers asking in public forums, "If UFOs are real, why don't commercial airline pilots ever see them?" How could these SETI scientists be so wrong when a simple Google search is all it takes to find reliable data on thousands of UFO sightings by commercial airline pilots? Similarly, an astronomer at the University of Arizona published an article in 2020 making the preposterous claim that UFO sightings "...stop at the borders of Canada and Mexico." Again, if the author or his editors had spent 5 minutes searching the Internet, they would have quickly learned that Canada and Mexico abound in UFO sightings, photos, videos, and even military reports.'

In other words, the standard lick Fri. 'I don't know but I'll tell you.' The problem is that no one really confronts the false information that is being repeated about UFOs. Basically, you can say the biggest bullshit and people will accept it as revealed truth anyway. In recent years this has been slowly changing, but not so long ago many people dared to say with full conviction that this UFO does not exist at all. And if one is compelled to accept their existence, then a 'brilliant' counter-argument must be devised to be lenient on the extraterrestrial hypothesis. All concocted arguments are completely discreditable based on false probabilities, logical fallacies or plain untruth. There is only one good counter-argument - despite the abundance of all the elements, the wreckage of the spacecraft or the bodies of its occupants have not been found. No alien in his ship stopped at Krakowskie Przedmieście or in front of the White House. If aliens visit us, there is no physical evidence of such visits that we can touch, examine and confirm (unless such evidence is being hidden from the public as whistleblowers point out). They may just be watching us, but we can't be 100% sure yet.

A reasonable statement about UFOs goes something like this: 'UFOs exist and sightings have been going on for thousands of years. The universe is so vast, full of stars and planets, and the Earth is relatively young, which means that we should somewhat expect visits from extraterrestrials, if only in the form of unmanned exploration probes. We have thousands of UFO sightings from reliable observers around the world, recordings, photos and special military reports describing unknown flying vehicles with unusual flight characteristics. Some of these objects may be ships of alien civilizations, but so far we have no physical evidence in the form of such a ship that we could touch and examine. It is therefore worth continuing the research.'

So Stephen Hawking could have said just that. Other scientists could also speak in this tone, presenting intellectual honesty. However, they usually don't do that. Many of them never did any research or dismissed the whole phenomenon as nonsense. The worrying thing is that absurd arguments and denial can deceive even the most outstanding scientists. This then gives rise to popular myths that seem plausible to the uninformed average eater, especially when heard from scientists.

Many popular articles about UFOs in the press are created in such a way that a confused journalist contacts a random scientist like physicist, astronomer, astrobiologist, asking him for his opinion on this strangely popular UFO topic of late. It seems that it makes sense - someone like that will probably be well acquainted with the whole subject and 'explain' what to think about it all. However, life shows that this is not the case at all, and frighteningly often the alleged 'expert' knows nothing because he has not read any studies, official reports, data or books. It's easier to say that it's just balloons and drones, after all.

'I don't know, but I'll tell you.'

'I will state my opinion as fact.'

'I will rely on the opinion of an uninformed person.'

Once again, it's worth using the same example - it's a bit like if an uninformed journalist was tasked with writing an article about Rafael Nadal, and therefore asks for the football journalist's opinion on him. Both football and tennis are sports, sports journalists cover them, but a football journalist may not necessarily have the necessary knowledge to cover Rafael Nadal in detail. He may have it, because in addition to football, he may also be interested in tennis, thanks to which he will make a detailed analysis and point out everything step by step. However, all he can say is phrases like: 'Rafael Nadal is a tennis player, he won something in his life, probably the whole, well, Tour de France' or present his opinion that Novak Djokovic is better as fact.

Contrary to appearances, most people are interested in the issue of extraterrestrial life, or that aliens could visit our planet. However, interest can quickly fade if one listens to such statements of experts, scientists who basically downplay the whole topic. It is easy to lose enthusiasm and reject the topic of UFOs as uninteresting. Meanwhile, contrary to what the media show, the scientific community is divided on this matter - some people are actually prejudiced in advance and annoyed by UFO research, but a whole lot of people are open to scientific research, collecting and analyzing data. Professor Peter Sturrock conducted an interesting study on this topic almost 50 years ago. As it turned out, skepticism and opposition to UFO research among astronomers was correlated simply with a lack of knowledge and familiarity with research: only 29% of those who spent less than an hour reading on the subject were in favor of further research, compared with 68% who spent more than 300 hours.

Let us remember that all the necessary information regarding UFOs is publicly available. All you need to do is spend some time getting to know them. It is understandable that many people do not intend to do this, because life is full of other, more pleasant pastimes. It is incomprehensible, however, how someone can speak in a decisive tone on a topic about which they have no clue otherwise. So we are waiting to see what the next UFO hearing in the US Senate Committee will bring.

From time to time, average bread eaters in Poland come across information that is hard to believe. A glance at the headline causes deep disbelief. That UFOs exist? That the Pentagon is conducting official research on UFOs? And that the team leader thinks some UFOs may be alien probes? How is this possible? After all, if that were the case, I, an average bread eater, would have learned about it from popular news programs, such as News, Fakty, Teleexpress, Events. The newscasts on the radio would mention it, and in the neighborhood store, reaching for a hearty eggplant, I would hear passionate discussions of customers about whether there are finally beings on Earth characterized by the legendary ability known as 'intelligence'.

Such interesting UFO reports would certainly be dissected by Polish journalists, known for writing meticulous articles on such important topics as their own feelings after a visit to an aqua park or describing a daring train ride, something that apparently lies beyond the reach of readers who crave I want to read these kinds of reports. Let's make a deal - if research on UFOs was conducted and high-ranking officials claimed that they could be vehicles of an alien civilization, then journalists would rise to the occasion and provide the average bread-eaters with all the necessary information in an accessible way. Certainly, they would not ignore such reports, they would not treat them with indulgence, believing that there are more important topics that should be presented to Polish citizens, such as the birth of an anteater in the local zoo or the last dress worn by a celebrity. For peculiar reasons, however, the subject of UFOs is neglected. Most people still know nothing about any studies, recordings, reports or statements.

Therefore, when someone browsing the Internet encounters this type of article, there is also an element of disbelief on a portal that someone may consider reputable. Does this UFO exist? And is there any research by the Pentagon? And they still say they might be aliens? That's a scandal. This cannot be so, because if it were, the average bread eater would have heard something about it earlier, would be properly prepared for this type of information. And when he wasn't, and when he suddenly discovers this type of article by surprise, there are two possibilities. Either a denial mechanism should be used, recognizing that it is simply impossible and omitting the information, or one should read the article to find out the details. Life has shown that reading more than the headline is often beyond the reach of the average bread-eater. In most cases, people are too lazy to read anything, although sometimes the problem is that reading the article is only available after turning off the ad blocker.

So what will we learn if we come across this type of article on one of the Polish Internet portals once every few months? The first thing we discover is that this article does not come from Onet.pl at all, but from the so-called 'prestigious' media company 'Politico'. The author of the article is a certain Lara Seligman who describes stories from the Pentagon for the said Politico. Some time ago, Onet established cooperation with Politico, thanks to which it can publish their materials and show them to Polish readers. So let's see what we can learn from this article. I quote:

In a draft paper dated March 7, Sean Kirkpatrick, head of AARO, the U.S. Department of Defense's office for unexplained phenomena and objects in the atmosphere, and Harvard University professor Avi Loeb wrote that objects that seem to defy all the laws of physics can be " probes" originating from an extraterrestrial "mother ship".

At this point, it is worth noting that many readers may be shocked to learn that there is an 'office' in the US that investigates the UFO phenomenon. Not only that - as we read, the head of this AARO office, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, wrote a paper with Harvard University professor Avi Loeb that some UFOs may be alien probes. For any person who has never heard of the developments of recent years, such statements seem to be, to put it mildly, astonishing. As we read, the work was published on March 7, 2023. The article is from yesterday, April 14, 2023. Let's read on:

'After Loeb posted it online, the article circulated on science news sites. POLITICO has confirmed its authenticity.'

In other words, the paper was published on March 7, 2023, it is on the official website of Harvard University from the beginning, but we know that such an article actually exists because Politico "confirmed its authenticity." It is worth appreciating such a quick action that took only 39 days. The Politico article then summarizes Loeb and Kirkpatrick's work describing that 'unexplained objects being investigated by the US Department of Defense may be 'probes' from the mothership.'

At this point, the uninformed reader may ask what unexplained objects are meant. Well, although the article does not mention it, in 2021 and 2023 the ODNI, i.e. the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, published two reports on UFOs. In both of them, there are 314 UFO reports that remain unexplained, with many of the sightings involving objects that appear to be performing highly advanced maneuvers. Some incidents have been recorded and made publicly available, such as Gimbal or Tic Tac. The general population still thinks of the popular dragees when they hear 'Tic Tac'. While the recordings have been made public, the pilots have been interviewed, and reports exist, most people have never heard of it. It was more important to inform people about celebrities.

But back to the Politico article. Basically, the entire work written by Loeb and Kirkpatrick, titled 'Physical Limitations of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena', is about how such objects might behave. The paper suggests that aliens could send a 'mothership' to other stars, from which smaller craft would then separate and travel to Earth. This is how some UFO sightings can be explained - they would be small space probes that separated from the parent ship.

'The paper compared the probes to 'dandruff seeds' that can be separated from their parent ship by the sun's gravity. The authors analyze the physics of how smaller craft could navigate through Earth's atmosphere to reach the surface where they could be seen by humans.'

The problem with this article is twofold. On the one hand, it is worth appreciating that the head of the Pentagon's UFO office is writing an article on this subject, suggesting that some objects may come from outer space. It's a bold statement. The aim of the work, however, was to determine the limitations of this type of objects. This immediately generates a lot of problems. For example, in the work we read that:

'Probably any functional devices embedded in the Earth's atmosphere do not carry biological beings, because they would not survive the long journey through interstellar space and its harsh conditions, including the energetic bombardment of cosmic rays, X-rays and gamma rays.'

One of the assumptions is that the alleged alien ships, if they were to come from outer space, probably have no passengers on board. The journey would allegedly be too long and the radiation too dangerous. If we humans would have a problem with that in 2023, then so would the more technologically advanced aliens, right? Moreover, Professor Avi Loeb, who is also not an expert on interstellar propulsion, suggested that the mothership may be ... just a rocket with conventional chemical propulsion, because the rockets carry their fuel, can navigate to a chosen planet and slow down near it.

As we read in the Politico article:

'The summary of the document says that these objects seem to defy the laws of physics: at the speed at which they are moving, scientists would expect to see a 'ball of fire'. The lack of a fireball or other typical "signatures" suggests "inaccurate measurements of distance (and therefore speed)".

In other words, according to Professor Loeb, if the Tic Tac, Gimbal, or any vehicle observed by the military doesn't generate a bright optical fireball by friction with the surrounding air and water, then the measurements are probably wrong. In his opinion, this is impossible, which shows the technological myopia of Professor Loeb, who is not willing to consider hypothetical more advanced propulsion systems than those we currently know. The aliens will use technology similar to that of humans.

These three arguments make the work controversial, to put it mildly, but for different reasons than those claimed by the alleged 'experts', which we'll get to in a moment. In general, Loeb and Kirkpatrick try to determine what seems 'possible' at present and what would be expected when observing unidentified vehicles. As Alejandro Rojas, board member of the Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies, states, 'The purpose of the paper is to challenge researchers to "exhaustively investigate objects before concluding that the laws of physics are being violated. The article states that Kirkpatrick "is open to considering the possibility of alien existence, but needs stronger arguments to claim that the laws of physics are being violated."

The claim that UFOs 'break the laws of physics' is hasty to say the least. Scientists in the past have repeatedly claimed that hypothetical propulsion is impossible, that it is impossible to build a heavier-than-air flying machine, doubts about the functionality of rockets. Perhaps more technologically advanced aliens have developed a drive that allows them to travel through the atmosphere without generating a 'bright fireball', as well as without a sonic boom. But let's get back to the point, once again quoting Politico:

"The documentary was made after Kirkpatrick contacted Loeb in the fall saying he would be in the Boston area and would like to meet up," Loeb told us. During the meeting, Kirkpatrick urged the professor to write a paper, but the two did not collaborate until earlier this year.'

We read important information here. After Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, an experienced physicist and government official, was appointed head of the new UFO Office, he decided to contact Professor Loeb. They met only recently, resulting in a joint work signed with their names, although in fact the main contribution to this work was made by Professor Avi Loeb. In a moment we will consider how Sean Kirkpatrick actually works. But first, let's move on to the last paragraph of the Politico article. Well, the author decided to ask for the opinion of another 'expert' who will throw a different light on the whole UFO issue. Let's listen carefully:

'David Jewitt, a professor of astronomy at the University of California, Los Angeles, said some of the claims made in the unpeer-reviewed paper were "highly questionable." He called the fact that Kirkpatrick co-authored the paper "strange." "Military aviation is very good at bombing, but I don't trust them much with their UFO research," says Jewitt, recalling that in 1948 a military pilot crashed chasing a UFO that later turned out to be the planet Venus.'

Here we have a standard situation that appears in most articles of this type written for a wider audience. If a journalist is already forced to report on UFO events, he must also consult the so-called 'experts'. At this point, the logical conclusion is that the 'expert' who will speak out in the press will certainly be a person who has gone to any lengths to research the subject of UFOs, someone who has read scientific publications on the subject, someone who has read official reports on UFOs from USA, as well as from other countries, e.g. the COMETA report, someone who looked at the recordings, photos and testimonies of thousands of military personnel from different countries of the world. Well, no. In these types of articles, a random 'expert' is usually asked for an opinion, which is usually an astronomer, or possibly a physicist. It's more or less like a journalist asking a football journalist for his opinion on Rafael Nadal. Not close, but not really.

So what did the professor of astronomy tell us? Well, the claims contained in the work are 'highly doubtful'. Though Jewitt didn't elaborate, he probably meant the fact that a Pentagon official is signing off on a paper on a mothership and alien probes coming to Earth. That Sean Kirkpatrick is the co-author of this paper is 'weird'. Moreover, we also read that the professor of astronomy believes that "when it comes to research on UFOs, he doesn't really trust military aviation." In other words, standard counter-arguments postulated by 'experts' who have no idea about the subject they are talking about. I once made an entire lengthy video about it, showing that most scientists, such as astronomers and physicists, are actually ignorant of UFOs because they have assumed in advance that there is nothing interesting about the subject. And since there is nothing interesting, they ignore all the reports of pilots and the military, downplay the recordings, photos, testimonies of informants, because they 'know better' while knowing nothing.

I might as well refer to the professor of astronomy's statements by pointing out that his claims in the article are 'highly questionable'. The professor did not say what exactly is highly doubtful, what I call 'strange'. First of all, I don't really 'trust' astronomers about UFOs, probably because for decades they felt it was beneath their dignity to conduct such research. Astronomers are good at studying stars and peeking through a telescope, but not at studying UFOs that are here in the air and not far out in space. One astronomer once publicly raved that UFOs appear only in the USA and are never seen by pilots, and another that the higher the quality of the testimony, the greater the probability that the unknown sighting will be explained. Such nonsense has been exposed by research by Professor Peter Sturrock, Special Report No. 14 of the Blue Book Project, and arbitrary testimonies of trained pilots. However, as we know, the intellectual cream for years raved about UFOs, and then no one confronts them or ridicule them because an 'astronomer' or 'physicist' could not be uninformed on this topic and could not spread misinformation.

At this point, it would be appropriate to ask who, then, Professor Jewitt 'trusts' more in the matter of UFO research than the military aviation equipped with ultra-modern fighters, the best-trained observers and modern recording equipment, including infrared? It is 'highly doubtful' that we will ever find out.

Finally, let's return to Kirkpatrick and Loeb. Well, Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick has been appointed as the new head of AARO's UFO office. Sean Kirkpatrick has never spoken about UFOs before, so it's not known how much he really knows about the subject. It is worth noting that he enlisted the help of Professor Avi Loeb, whom he apparently deemed competent to write the paper together. Here you can add Professor Loeb's fixation on the interstellar object Oumuamua that appeared in our solar system in 2017. Loeb thought it might be an alien ship. As we can see, the Politico article gave a picture of just this object. The media has been returning to this story for years, showing that journalists are lost like children in a fog. They often pay more attention to this Oumuamua object than to the hundreds of UFO sightings on Earth where we have recordings, photos, and testimonies of trained pilots. Oumuamua has as much in common with UFO sightings on Earth as a chair with an electric chair. And yet Professor Loeb is trying to show that perhaps aliens would send a mothership to Earth, which could be Oumuamua. Tic Tac Incident of 2004? Let's forget it because that was 13 years before Oumuamua.

Through a bill signed by Joe Biden, the AARO office reviews historical UFO incidents since 1945. The bill also exempts so-called 'whistleblowers', i.e. whistleblowers, informers, keeping the secrecy clause. Such individuals, who used to run the Pentagon's secret UFO programs and beyond, can now give information to Kirkpatrick without fear of breaking the law and further consequences. And interestingly, these people actually flock to Kirkpatrick giving him detailed information about what they saw or what they were working on. Officially, we already know that the testimonies were given by the military who saw UFOs near nuclear bases, as well as during military tests or ordinary flights. Unofficially, according to multiple sources, more than 3 people have passed information to Kirkpatrick that they were working on a secret "UFO disaster recovery" program. As unbelievable as it sounds, there have been a whole bunch of people in the US government for years who repeat like a mantra that the US has recovered some kind of 'extraterrestrial technology'. By the way, let's remember that most people have no idea about UFO recordings, research, or reports, so it would be a 'big exaggeration' to say that the US would additionally recover extraterrestrial technology.

What then happened? Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick, who now hears such first-hand testimony, must be quite shocked. He doesn't quite know what to make of it all as he listens to the testimonies of pilots, military men, officers and officials about out-of-this-world vehicles. So she goes for advice to the eminent professor Avi Loeb, who pointed out a few years ago that Omuamua could be an interstellar ship. Avi Loeb was also open to the idea that the latest UFO sightings could also involve alien vehicles. Together, they wrote a paper that established the physical limitations of UFOs. It is likely that Avi Loeb himself wrote the entire work, but Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick also signed the work. The work is not perfect because it assumes too much about how UFOs can move and what propulsion they use. However, this is another milestone ahead. Why?

Well, because now the media, various Internet portals, can reprint articles about the fact that here and even the 'head of the Pentagon UFO office' claims that some UFOs may be alien probes. Then uninformed average bread eaters read this type of revelation and do not really know what to do with all this. Some don't even know all the UFO stories from recent years. Suddenly they fire up the internet and seeing such a header there is a problem. Such behavior is somewhat funny - you yourself have certainly seen the situation where someone suddenly sees such an article and is surprised that how come UFOs are alien ships? That we now live in such a time that even UFOs can be extraterrestrial? Well, no, because an extraterrestrial explanation for UFOs is a hypothesis that was proposed as early as 1947, and some Pentagon officials advocated it as early as 1948. However, as we know, the later 'Robertson Team' employed by the CIA issued a recommendation to downplay UFO reports through media centers. The average bread eaters themselves are also not driven by curiosity and usually rely on what journalists tell them. And if they kept silent or downplayed the reports, there was clearly nothing interesting about it. And when an article about UFOs suddenly appears, there is also cognitive dissonance.

In the coming days, Sean Kirkpatrick is to be questioned by the U.S. Senate Committee on UFOs. It is not known what he will tell them then, but it is known that when this happens once again there will appear a flood of articles about the fact that there is an official hearing about UFOs. The open question remains whether the media reports on this subject will be meticulously scrutinizing every nuance, or whether it is usually only superficial because there are supposedly more important topics, such as celebrities. Well, this open question is not open at all, because the answer is obvious. Accurately presenting all UFO information seems out of reach.

Sunday, April 16, 2023

The shocking disappearance of a 79-year-old woman in Vilnius

 There are few cases as mysterious and tragic as the disappearance of Kazimiera Zaremba. The woman went on a pilgrimage to Vilnius together with many people she had known before and met regularly in the church. The organizer of the trip was a priest whom she trusted implicitly. It is terrifying that all these people have failed Ms. Kazimiera. She was left alone in a foreign country, without knowledge of the language and the possibility of contacting her relatives.

Kazimiera Zaremba lived in Bełchatów (Łódź Province). The 79-year-old was very religious. She went to church almost every day. She was also considered a sociable person. So it's not surprising that she was always looking forward to taking part in the pilgrimage. The more so because their friend, priest Piotr Kotas, was most often responsible for their organization.

The man was a curate in Mrs. Kazimiera's parish. Relatives mention that the woman treated him like a good friend, and even a son or grandson. She trusted him too. The priest often visited the 79-year-old at her home. He even met her the day before his pilgrimage to the capital of Lithuania, Vilnius. The relatives had concerns about the departure of the 79-year-old. She had never traveled abroad before. However, the woman really wanted to go to see the chapel of the Gate of Dawn with the famous painting of the Mother of God. So the family finally accepted this decision.

The pilgrimage, consisting of several dozen faithful, a priest-organizer, and a guide, set off on a bus early in the morning on Friday, September 28, 2012. On the night from Friday to Saturday, the participants spent the night in Augustów. Kazimiera Zaremba was already acting strangely at that time, according to the accounts of women with whom she shared a room at the time. The 79-year-old reportedly woke up in the middle of the night and wanted to go home. Her friends had the impression that she did not know where she was. They reportedly did not sleep at night, afraid that Zaremba would leave the room. However, they did not report the incident to relatives.

The next day the pilgrims went directly to Vilnius. The most important event of the whole trip is planned for Saturday, i.e. a mass in the chapel of Our Lady of Ostra Brama. According to people who attended the service, Mrs. Kazimiera took a seat close to the exit. At some point, however, the woman left the chapel. Some said she went looking for a toilet. According to others, she wanted to buy stamps or postcards. It is certain, however, that when the mass ended, the 79-year-old was not found in or near the chapel.

Participants of the pilgrimage began to search for the missing woman. Some said it lasted about half an hour, others said about fifteen minutes. Apparently, there were voices that the faithful came to Vilnius to visit, not to look for Mrs. Kazimiera. The atmosphere became nervous. Father Piotr finally decided that the trip would go on. Nobody objected to this decision. It is also shocking that the local police were not notified.

Instead, the priest called Kazimiera Zaremba's telephone number. However, the mobile was picked up by the older daughter of the missing woman who lived with her. It turned out that the 79-year-old had left her phone at home. Relatives were alarmed by an unexpected call. They were also surprised by the attitude of the vicar and the participants of the trip. They didn't seem to care too much about the situation.

The saddest thing is that about an hour later, a missing elderly woman appeared in the parking lot where the bus had left. She looked confused. She grabbed the door handles of various vehicles, trying to get inside. We know this because the surveillance video has been preserved. If the fellow travelers had devoted a little more time and energy to the search, everything would probably have ended happily.

While the faithful, as if nothing had happened, visited the largest Lithuanian city, Mrs. Kazimiera wandered around its streets. Cameras at a gas station about six kilometers from the site of the disappearance recorded the woman. It took place on the night from Saturday to Sunday around 3:00. The woman went inside and asked for chamomile. We know this because the woman working there spoke Polish and passed this information on to the investigators looking for Zaremba.

It seems puzzling that the gas station was about 6 kilometers away from the chapel where the service was taking place. Close relatives of Mrs. Kazimiera claim that she would not be able to walk such a long route. It is speculated that someone could give the woman a lift by car or she used public transport. However, we do not know what it was like in reality.


The 79-year-old was also found on another camera recording. On Sunday, September 30, around 9:00 in the morning, we see a woman approaching the caretaker of one of the Lithuanian tenement houses. However, Mrs. Kazimiera was not wearing a coat, handbag or glasses at that time, which she always wore. It all seems very strange. The woman must have been freezing, because autumn had begun. In particular, the nights and mornings become chilly, especially for someone who has no outer covering.

However, the man whom the old lady accosts is not helpful. This may be due to the language barrier, because Mrs Kazimiera does not know Lithuanian. The caretaker ignores the woman, who soon leaves. Later, investigators were able to track down the man. He said that the woman from Poland was probably cold. He knew nothing else. This is the last surveillance video on which the missing person was found. Her further fate from that moment remains a mystery.

Meanwhile, on September 30, the day when Mrs. Kazimiera is seen on the surveillance recordings for the last time, the trip returns to Bełchatów. However, no one is contacting the family or trying to help in any way. Everyone pretends nothing bad happened. The behavior of the priest, who had previously often visited the woman and had a very close relationship with her, is particularly outrageous. Now he completely distances himself from this unpleasant situation.

The curate finally appears in Mrs. Kazimiera's apartment. Then he brings things that she left on the bus. He also informs the family that the woman wanted to disappear herself. He is unable to show even a shred of empathy and compassion. A few months after his disappearance, Piotr Kotas goes to another parish, where he becomes a parish priest. The man certainly did not like the media hype around the case and his person. He just wanted to get as far away from the consequences of his passivity and callousness as possible.

The missing woman's family knows they must act. Relatives contact the Lithuanian police. Investigators access the aforementioned surveillance recordings. Vilnius hospitals, nursing homes and other facilities where the 79-year-old could go are checked. Police are also searching the area where the woman disappeared and was later seen. Investigators are also checking the list of people who died shortly after the disappearance. In particular, those with unidentified identity are verified. However, there is no trace of Mrs. Kazimierza anywhere.

The case is publicized by the media - both Lithuanian and Polish. The media hype that arises around the disappearance unfortunately does not lead to any breakthrough. The posters that are hung all over the city do not help either. The family is distraught. Relatives want those who organized the trip to be held accountable. They report the possibility of committing a crime to the prosecutor's office. However, the prosecutor's office refuses to initiate proceedings in this case. It states that the tour operator did not commit any faults.

In 2019, the daughters of the missing woman went to Lithuania. They then had the opportunity to visit the same places where their mother had been seen. Above all, however, the women went to get acquainted with the catalog of the deceased in Lithuania of unknown identity. However, they did not recognize Mrs. Kazimiera in any of these people.

According to the theory most believed by investigators, the missing woman may still be alive. It is assumed that she may have been taken in by someone who took pity on a terrified and cold woman. If so, why didn't the person report it to the police?

Another scenario is that the woman died shortly after disappearing. She may have died of natural causes (starvation, thirst or hypothermia). There is also the possibility that the woman had an accident that resulted in her death.

It cannot be ruled out that someone deprived Mrs. Kazimiera of her life. This option seems less likely to me personally. The woman no longer had a purse or any other valuables with her (at least according to the latest monitoring recording). What other motive could a possible killer have?

But these are all conjectures. What is certain, however, is that the family has unfortunately not learned the truth to this day. Relatives still hope that Mrs Kazimiera will be found alive. Unfortunately, the chances of that decrease every year. Today, the woman would be 90 years old.



Atlantis may be hiding under the ice of Antarctica

 In 1958, historian Charles Hapgood proposed a "pole shift theory". According to this hypothesis, movements of the earth's crust made it possible to free large areas of the Antarctic continent from ice around 12,000 years ago. These conclusions have led some to speculate that the legendary Atlantis is not hidden underwater, and perhaps under a thick layer of ice.

Hapgood's theory relied heavily on an artifact known today as the Piri Reis map. It is a manuscript discovered in Turkey in 1930. It was discovered by the German theologian Gustav Adolf Deismann. Deissmann was appointed by the Turkish Ministry of Education to catalog non-Islamic works in the Topkapı Palace Library. The researcher showed it to the orientalist Paul Calais, who identified it as a map compiled by the Ottoman admiral and cartographer Piri Reis.


The fragment found at Topkapi contained the preserved western third of a map of the world drawn on gazelle skin parchment. The find became an international sensation as this 16th-century map depicted South America geographically correctly in relation to Africa. The strangest thing, however, is that the map shows what appears to be the north coast of Antarctica if it were ice-free. Piri Reis's map is said to include an area known as Queen Maud Land.

Hapgood concluded that Antarctica had been mapped long before the Turkish Admiral was born, adopting the view that Antarctica's warm period coincided with the last ice age in the northern hemisphere. The maps depicting Antarctica must therefore have been based on "ancient" maps derived from Ice Age originals. This means that the lost continent which was supposed to be the legendary Atlantis could actually be a different name for today's Antarctica.

The first historical mention of Atlantis is in the work of the Greek philosopher Plato, who refers to the city as a sanctuary built by a hybrid species between gods and humans, 9,000 years before his time. These dates coincide with the dates determined by the "polar shift theory". The mythical cataclysm responsible for the destruction of the Atlanteans would then be the retreat of the ice sheet. Although this theory currently seems difficult to prove, it must be admitted that there are many reasons for its credibility.

Antarctica as an ice-free continent also appears on other maps "before" its discovery. A fascinating find is the map of Hadji Ahmed, published in 1559. This amazing map shows the exact delineation of the west coast of North America and Antarctica. The map even shows where the land bridge connects Siberia and Alaska. This connection no longer exists, but its location on the map indicates that it dates back to the times when this natural bridge was still present.

Additionally, the Buache map published in 1737 by Philippe Buache was also supposed to be based on much older maps. Interestingly, like many other ancient maps, this one also shows Antarctica without ice. To this list, you can add the Oronce Finé world map, which shows the continent before it was officially "found", in addition to showing continental rivers, valleys, and coastlines, and even the approximate location of today's South Pole.

It is not difficult to conclude that the knowledge presented by cartographers must have come from the past. This belief was also shared by the highest-ranking officials of the Third Reich. Around the existence of a German base in Antarctica, sometimes called New Swabia, Base 22 or New Berlin. Some say that this is where the defeated Nazis moved. It is true that since the mid-1930s, the Germans have sought the same knowledge of ancient civilizations on which the legendary maps were supposed to be based. Their investigation took them to many regions of the world, from Tibet to the North Pole.

The theory that the discovery of Atlantis has so far been unsuccessful because the remains of this legendary civilization are hidden under several kilometers of ice definitely differs from the classical ideas about the fate of this culture. At the moment, it is impossible to say whether any society settled in this region and may have existed there until the end of the ice age. Many potential locations for this lost land have been proposed over the centuries. It was to be hidden in the Mediterranean Sea, the Atlantic Ocean, and even in the heart of the Sahara. Without additional evidence, the Antarctica theory is just another hypothesis on a long and unverifiable list.

A kilometer long crater was formed in the place of the eruption-damaged dome of the Shiveluch volcano

 At the site of the destroyed lava dome of the Shiveluch volcano in Kamchatka, a crater with a diameter of about one kilometer was formed. This was reported by the Institute of Volcanology and Seismology of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

The first satellite images of the volcano after its violent eruption a week ago have been published.


In the infrared, experts have spotted an annular structure of high temperatures in the central part of the crater. The pyroclastic flow did not go west, its main branches headed south and southeast of the volcano. Determining their exact boundaries is still difficult with cloudiness.
Apparently there was an explosion headed southeast. Most of the structure of the active dome was destroyed. A huge crater was formed, more than a kilometer in diameter. The strongest outgassing fumarole activity is observed in the crater.
Recall that the eruption of the Shiveluch volcano took place on April 11. Scientists have named the accompanying ash fall as the strongest in the past 60 years. Nearly 1,500 cubic meters of volcanic ash were removed from Kamchatka settlements.
The eruption of Shiveluch will continue for a long time. And the ash and mesh compounds will remain in the atmosphere for some time, causing periodic cooling. Scientists believe that the main phase of the eruption is over, but with such elements you can never be sure.


Do you see what's going on here too?

 Am I the only one who sees that all this is not only somewhat, to put it mildly, "strange", but it is slowly starting to come together?

➡️ Cholera and Ebola are spreading in Africa. In the USA and Europe, record numbers of cases of a dangerous type of fungus Candida Auris, pneumonia lasting for weeks, streptococcal infection, norovirus. The increase in HIV incidence among humans is absolutely record-breaking, and populations of wild (and farmed) birds are literally being massacred by bird flu, which has already begun to attack forest mammals. Only a few unfortunate mutations separate us from the jump to humans.

Since 2020, the incidence of infectious diseases, but also mental or cardiological ones, has skyrocketed. It can no longer be covered up. And this applies both to those who were "stung" and to those who avoided the "sting." I wasn't stung or even tested for KNOWN WHAT. And yet I also struggle with various infections (now shingles + otitis media, it gave me a hard time). I have observed that it doesn't matter if there was a sting or not - people get sick en masse!

➡️ Is it possible that a "mean troublemaker" escaped from some lab0, specially tuned by geneticists to destroy the immune system even after asymptomatic illness, causing an AIDS-like disease, plus to attach to receptors that are throughout the body (ACE ), causing the "mean troublemaker" to aggravate any existing disease and damage any previously weakened organ?

ATTENTION, the above is not some strange "theory", but in this, 2023, it was officially confirmed by the US FBI. The problem is, they don't talk about it on TV, so you don't know about it.

IT IS ILLUSIONS THAT GIVE STRENGTH TO LIFE

 It is said that the less a person knows, the easier it is to live. Knowledge gives freedom, but it makes you unhappy. This is an extended version of an article that was published recently.

➡️ The concept of faith is more than just believing in religious dogma. Faith is inseparable from hope. Hope it gets better or at least good. Belief in political ideologies, each of which promises a better world, is also faith.

Now, after the actual collapse of the great religions (zealous believers are perhaps a few percent of the population), there is another faith. So the belief that after finishing school you will find a nice job, then you will meet an equally nice woman, you will have two children and a dog, and you will write your positive "end of history" in an elegant house in the suburbs, or at least in an apartment on a development estate. And then the angels in heaven will weep with emotion, and the end credits will announce: and they lived happily ever after.

Entire generations born in the 70s, 80s, 90s and 00s grew up with this belief. However, due to the massive access to information (internet), the younger generation is completely devoid of illusions, hopes and dreams. They know that they are probably going to be screwed in Januszex Sp. z o.o., renting an apartment for the rest of your life, and difficult vicissitudes in relationships or almost complete lack of them.

Then a new kind of belief develops: YOLO, meaning you only live once. Total atheism and materialism, focusing only on hedonism and pleasure, as much consumption as possible, getting women (a small group of men can do that), or getting handsome men who create tinder harems.

➡️ this is an expression of deep human fear of the unknown, of the abyss of infinity and ignorance.

Each faith gives ready answers to these questions, and calms this fear.

In turn, the search for knowledge about this world piece by piece deprives faith in anything, but also hopes and dreams.

These sweet illusions are true, true, but they give strength and drive to live, to somehow feel the meaning of existence in this vale of tears.

Knowledge deprives you of a sense of meaning, purpose and the will to live. Because this world is not very successful or cool. And there is no answer why this world is like this. She won't be until she dies. Either you accept it or you don't. If not - then you can, for example, return to religious faith, throw yourself into the colorful and shimmering neon signs of esotericism, or do anything else. But it won't change anything.

And then you must fend for yourself, sailing the sea of infinity.

➡️ So it's not the "bad internet" that is the cause of this and no other attitude of young people. But ACCESS TO INFORMATION and KNOWLEDGE. Older generations didn't have it, and entering adulthood at the age of 25, they entered full of various false ideas about life. They were at the stage of children believing that if they were good, Santa Claus would give them a bag of candy. And later life verified these beliefs. Young people, on the other hand, have no illusions from the start. So cynicism, Machiavellianism, attitude towards the greedy accumulation of goods and pleasures, or depression, discouragement and nihilism remained.

And to the other extreme? What if we provided people with various goods so that life would not be a struggle for survival from month to month, but would be ... life? This was demonstrated by Calhoun's experiment on mice. There was unlimited access to food. Within a few generations, they degenerated horribly and the colony died out. Prosperity has a similar effect on people – just look at the well-fed Western societies. Both bad and so bad, and many problems of human and world nature are insoluble.

For the very basis of the world is an error or a gross imperfection. Solving one old problem creates several new problems. It is an endless error matrix that is just entering the era of a new dark age of the abyss.

DO YOU THINK WE HAVE FREE WILL?

 A professor with outstanding achievements chaired a panel discussing the philosophy of free will at one of the universities.

At the very beginning of the lecture, he said that participants who do not believe in free will have breaks every 45 minutes. And those students who believe in free will are to stay in the lecture hall during breaks, they cannot leave it, also when it comes to using the toilet.

➡️ A forest of indignant hands raised up spoke to this: - But how? How can you forbid us to go to the shop or to the toilet!?

Then the professor said: - After all, you believe in free will and that only you are responsible for your life, and further saying that you can do anything, you just have to want it. So order your asses to stop shi**ing and your gens to stop pi**ing.

There was consternation among the participants, so the professor continued:

I know you can't do that, so shitting and pissing are clearly limiting your free will.

➡️ But think how many more such factors limit your free will and the ability to decide about your life?

When you were born, you were given a set of genes that significantly influence who you are now. Among them is e.g. what level of neurotransmitters you have, which determines whether you are extroverted or introverted, happy or prone to depression, neurotypical or autistic, emotionally stable or unstable, mentally healthy or schizophrenic.

In addition, your genes determine your susceptibility to various diseases or resistance to them. They also determine strength or weakness. And so on.

The upbringing you have been subjected to programs your subconscious mind in a certain way, and it intensifies or weakens what you have been given in your DNA. This is often a very negative impact.

Random factors such as accidents, being a victim of crime, disasters can also leave a lifelong mark on you.

Reversing this is a multi-year process, and is very difficult, if not impossible.

➡️ Next: place of birth - is it a rich or poor region? Is there peace or is there war going on?

I have one more stumbling block. Well, I heard that an infant was transported to the emergency department with the so-called SCA (sudden cardiac arrest). Despite more than an hour of resuscitation, the child died. It was a drama for the whole ward, doctors, nurses and paramedics cried with their parents. But the next day came. Next duty, more medical successes as well as dramas.

Eventually, even my parents came to terms with it, after many years. I am very surprised by one thing... If this child was killed by some degenerate, it would shake not only our country for a long time. And if senseless and cruel death is simply inflicted by nature, we submissively pass over it.

➡️ My words may seem absurd to you, but pay attention to one thing. Well, the late philosopher and mystic, Robert Anton Wilson, said that if you don't consider yourself slaves, why don't you rebel against death? These words of his can also be understood a bit broader - why don't you rebel against the conditions that we found in this world, and which are not very friendly at all?

I know it's hard to blame anyone or anything in this child's situation. Because the perpetrator - that is, nature creating a mass of injured, sick and so on - is so elusive in this discourse. People pass it by, sometimes only lamenting to the heavens that God (nature) allows such bad things to happen on Earth.

So, what's there to rebel against? You don't know either. There are a whole lot of factors that, to put it bluntly, limit our free will and dictate how we should act.

And what is your opinion on this? I invite you to the discussion.

HUGE NUMBER OF NEW DEATHS AND DISEASES!

 ➡️ A large number of excess deaths since 2020.

➡️ Increasing number of HIV infections.

➡️ Hundreds of thousands of people suffer from colds a month. The season is record breaking.

➡️ Totally packed queues in mental health clinics as well as in others, e.g. cardiology.

➡️ The number of cases of extremely dangerous diseases, such as Candida Auris (fungus), New Delhi (bacteria) and a number of other local diseases, is growing very fast.

➡️ Several brand new disease entities, such as hemorrhagic pneumonia.

After 2019, something massively destroyed the immunity of a large number of people on Earth. I think that releasing a "worm", which, after entering the body, ravages the immune system, as well as the nervous or circulatory system, was a planned strategy to get rid of a large number of people, wearing white gloves for several dozen years. The role of "remedies" administered in offices in this process is also widely discussed.

Death from acquired immunodeficiency, a disease somewhat similar to AIDS but not specifically related to HIV, does not occur immediately. This is not visible to the public as some kind of apocalyptic mass extinction. But various pathogens attach themselves to such a person every moment. For many years, the effects of these diseases as well as the side effects of drugs (e.g. antibiotics) devastate the patient's body and lead to death.

➡️ the results of what happened between 2019 and 2022 will only be known after several dozen years. For now, we need to observe the reality that surrounds us, take care of ourselves and our loved ones. Be vigilant!

Friday, April 7, 2023

My opinions on Life is Strange, Life is Strange Before the Storm, Life is Strange 2 and Life is strange True Colors

 Life is Strange is similar to the Telltale games and the movie "Butterfly Effect". Unfortunately, it also has a bit of the TV tapeworm "Sabrina the Teenage Witch".

The very beginning of Life is Strange is quite a refreshment, and the idea that time can be turned back in games not only to avoid death in Prince of Persia but simply to maintain a good relationship with someone appears very often. Using the new abilities of the main character, it is possible to approach the same dialogues several times and end them in the way that is most convenient for us. After a few such motives, however, a conversation appears, where it turns out that every solution is wrong. A great thing to imply that sometimes it's just... that's fate? Or that certain people behave as they do, regardless of our trials and efforts? In this respect, Life is Strange is indeed unique, under the guise of science-fiction, it smuggles very real life threads. Sometimes, unfortunately, a bit too intrusive and clear, which is somehow responsible for the place of action - a school filled with teenagers.

I really like stories about teenagers, even today, when I am closer to thirty than eighteen and the excitement caused by the possibility of legally buying beer. However, it must be a book/movie/game "about" and not "for". Unfortunately, Life is Strange often exceeds this limit and turns from a pretty cool universal plot into a drama for teenagers, which older players will only shrug off. The quite predictable archetypes of school personalities interact with each other in various predictable ways, so there is a school star who, as it happens in life, can neither boast of exaggerated beauty nor intelligence. There are gray mice and glasses, macho boys and real gentlemen standing in the shadows, and finally various emo individuals who can't stand the fact that they were caught drunkenly hugging someone. Oh, life, unfortunately playing a bit too big a role here. It's nice that not only indie gems, but also commercial games can talk about quite normal things, but it's a pity that they do it in such a boring way. At times I was genuinely tired of those school "Hard Matters" and I just wanted to finish them, although I honestly have to admit that it is because of this routine that even minor supernatural threads become so fresh and unique here.

Sometimes the fun ends like this.

At least for the player, because the heroes sometimes do not see the gravity of the situation. For example, a friend who still doesn't believe me asks for some proof that I can actually turn back time. So I step back to tell her what's about to happen around us. And I'm telling, but I'm confusing the order. And my friend doesn't like it! No sense, after all, such a prediction of the next few minutes would make an impression on everyone. This small element shows that it is much more difficult to make a dialogue-based adventure game than a simple shooter. In the FPS game, we don't think, we just move ahead. Here there are dozens of ideas for solving a given situation, but you have to shoot at the right one. Another example - I'm late for a meeting, my friend texts me that it's going to be forever. I'm reading these messages and... I can't just text back that I'm going to be late because I ran into the principal. I don't have anything in my account? There are many similar illogical moments.

It's a pity that the non-linearity is limited to basic dialogue decisions, not small gameplay solutions like entering somewhere or doing something. Although ironically, you can't complain about the gameplay here, because Life is Strange is a balanced combination of a telltale, interactive and dialogue-based film with elements of classic point-and-click adventures. Conversations alternate with exploration-based sections where you have to find specific items and sometimes combine them properly.

On the director's rug

It is not without reason that every important decision is symbolized by a butterfly in the corner of the screen. This one appears both in quite obvious moments and completely unexpectedly, in seemingly trivial conversations and situations. Like in Telltale games, however, the story goes its own way, simply adapting to our decisions later. It's nice that these decisions are also reminded of us, or even reminded of. Once I did not stand up for a friend in an argument, which she did not fail to point out to me after some time. Even better, however, is the story, which is slowly gaining momentum, and the unintended consequences of our initially trivial manipulations of time are getting bigger. While at the beginning we go back a minute to find out the answer to the question asked by the teacher, to be the first to report and thus fall for the top student, over time we go back more and more, making really big changes. which ones? I won't say, but I will admit that a few plot twists are impressive, and then leave us with our own thoughts, because it's an episode-based game after all.

Today, however, came out last, having a complete season on the disc, so you don't have to wait weeks for the finale. Today it is also clear that the creators really did a great job with building the plot and atmosphere. While the first two episodes were just fun, the next three are really addictive. The action thickens, and just when it seems that everything is explained, there is a big BOOM, the action goes on, and the creators give the player a few more false leads + serve an important choice at the end.

The detail of the environment plays a big role in the game. However, the graphics do not strive for photorealism

Life is Strange runs on the Unreal Engine, which is obvious at first glance. For example, after delayed texture loading. When playing on Xbox One, it happened that for the first seconds of dialogues, the characters resembled mannequins, and only after a while they gained details. Although even then they did not spoil with their quantity. The comic setting of the game somewhat justifies this, which cannot be said about the lip-syncing of spoken lines. Cel-shading is no excuse here. In "normal" games I don't mind it, but in story-driven titles where we look at talking heads for hours, it should be at the highest level, and it's not. The second thing is that I don't like this element in The Witcher III either - it's just for the sake of a broader perspective and to show that what offends me can be completely ignored by someone else. The surroundings are very nice. It's colorful and cohesive, plus it's very detailed and boasts some nice effects.

I can't say a bad word about the music either. The publisher invested in some well-known teen tracks and also hired talented songwriters (or bought some nice stock tracks, I don't know). Anyway, the soundtrack is great, and the dialogue sounds great too. It's nice to listen to them, especially since they are full of various interjections or sayings and abbreviations typical for teenagers, also in text messages and e-mails. What impressed me the most, apart from the plot, were the photos. Image cropping, camera work, smooth transitions from cutscenes to the actual game. This is especially visible at the beginning of each episode, where we get an intricately prepared introduction that perfectly combines the image with the music.

A static picture won't show it, but the framing and camera work are very nice here.

Life is Strange relies heavily on the best mechanics of Remember Me - we have to interact with various objects and through trial and error, rewind time and retry, get what we want. It worked in the previous game from the creators of Dontnod, and it works now. There is no running and shooting, but nicely written dialogues and a plot that, although it could accelerate a little faster, once it accelerates, it holds until the end. If Life is Strange grabbed you from the first episode, you'll probably play the rest anyway. However, if, like me, you were rather skeptical at the beginning, then play at least until the third episode inclusive. I bet you'll get hooked.

"Life is Strange: Before the Storm" may not be as fresh as the original, there is no time travel or a huge tornado, but it still leaves you with a sense of satisfaction and unsatisfaction at the same time after finishing the whole thing. And that's what only damn good games do for me.

It's relatively easy to write a reasonably likable character in a video game. It is enough for her to seem nice, assign her a few positive qualities (helpful, brave, and preferably always smiling) and the job is done. It's more difficult when you try to sell the heroine, at first glance, irritating, impudent and behaving more than once (and not twice) simply ridiculously. And this is the local protagonist - Chloe Price (dubbed this time by Rhianna DeVries). Over the course of three (+1 bonus) episodes, we see her trying to cope with her increasingly complicated teenage life. The void left by her tragically deceased father seems to be filled by a new friend, Rachel Amber. Both girls quickly get involved in a thicker family-criminal affair, gradually finding a deeper feeling in each other.

The story itself is nothing amazing, but it offers a lot of memorable, well-directed and emotional moments. So small, ordinary, when Chloe and Rachel were just together. The strictly moral part was solid, it was nice to feel the small-town atmosphere of Blackwell again. It is a pity that the clearly shorter whole unfortunately forced the narrative to break the neck in the last episode, so the finale does not have a proper foundation. In addition, we have the "choose your ending" situation again, which may leave a little bad taste, but I was able to forgive the writers for it anyway (events had to be consistent with the original anyway).

From "Before the Storm" came the main gameplay idea of Dontnod. Chloe doesn't have the power to play with time, so the environmental puzzles are extremely simple, and the game part is rather purely symbolic (limited exploration of the location, looking at items). Therefore, the developers at Deck Nine decided to introduce an argument system, which in theory suits a saucy teenager like young Price, and if done right, it would deserve praise. The problem is that convincing our interlocutors is trivial (we have a few seconds to choose one of several answers), because often the right option to say is all too obvious if we only listen carefully to the other person. In addition, there are situations when the insults thrown are really bizarre, and the level of cringe sometimes reaches such a level that I happened to genuinely laugh at the computer. Fortunately, not all of them, but unfortunately, in my opinion, it did not turn out very well. Also, some scenes reminded me of Twilight, but maybe it's just me.

Still, it's a very good prequel. It stands on its own feet enough for people unfamiliar with the first "Life is Strange" to perceive it as a standalone story, and it sensibly adds a lot of valuable context to the original and expands on Chloe's character, perfectly portraying her disarmingly sincere friendship/love (delete as appropriate) with Rachel. If, like me, you loved the adventure of Max and Chloe from three years ago, then take "Before the Storm" boldly, you will find a lot for yourself here.

In Life is Strange 2, the French studio Dontnod returns to the patterns that worked in the first part of this adventure game, although of course we were served a new story. It is a story about growing up, shyly presenting some important problems of the modern world. But is it enough to at least match the excellent original?

The adventure divided into episodes has finally come to an end, and the full edition of the two, containing all its episodes, has appeared in stores. This is an excellent opportunity to immerse yourself in a poignant and often sad story about two brothers who, due to a coincidence, were forced to leave their home and embark on an exhausting journey into the unknown.

The story of teenager Sean, whom we play, and his younger brother, Daniel, whom we take care of, begins in his hometown of Seattle. Our hero leads the life of a typical American teenager - he is interested in girls, goes to parties, drinks alcohol and smokes weed, and in his free time he listens to music and draws in his notebook. She also has to put up with an annoying brother, whom she often takes care of due to the lack of a mother.

However, a lazy story quickly turns into a nightmare. As a result of a misunderstanding, our heroes' father dies. They, being suspected of murdering a policeman, have to run away from home. Added to this are the supernatural abilities of young Daniel, revealing themselves, among others, in stressful situations.

The plot slowly pushes us south, towards the Mexican border, where the boys' father came from. The story moves very slowly at many points, and some parts seem to have been added forcibly. However, they serve to get to know the characters better and bite into the unusual bond that connects them.

It is worth noting that knowledge of the first part of the game is not required. At the beginning of the adventure, however, we are asked if we played it and what decision we made at the end. This has little effect on the plot. Fans of the first part will also notice small flavors, and others will not lose anything by ignoring them completely. A save game from the free The Awesome Adventures of Captain Spirit is also loaded. Here, too, the creators wink at us.

Although not all parts of the plot line up perfectly, it must be admitted that Dontnod has learned its lesson from interpersonal relations. Sean, due to his age, feels responsible for his younger brother, who is still a child. It is his duty to embrace the situation and teach Daniel to control his supernatural abilities. These skills are by the way not as interesting as in the first part. Daniel can move and destroy objects at will. Playing with time travel with Life is Strange was much more interesting and gave more opportunities to diversify the gameplay. Unfortunately, that was missing here.

The science theme is great. Daniel watches our actions closely. If we go to theft, he will do the same, using us as a model. It's the same with swearing, for example. If we do not scold the younger brother at the right moment, we will listen to the colorful bouquets spoken by the child until the end of the game. Our attitude towards Daniel, who, admittedly, can be irritating at times, also influences his decisions. If we often anger him and speak against him, he may not listen to us and do something against us. Something that could have serious consequences later on.

Life is Strange 2 is also great in terms of the characters you encounter. These are very interestingly outlined and most of them make you want to interact, others you even hate - just like in the real world. It's a pity that the individual episodes are very uneven. In the first one, we are practically on our own - we meet few NPCs, and the conversation with the younger brother quickly becomes irritating. There are too many of them in the third one. One would like these moments to last a bit longer at the expense of others where the story is stretched forcibly.

The creators also raise several important social issues in the game. On our way, we meet hippies who have abandoned ordinary life for a carefree existence. There are also themes of love, homosexuality, religious fanaticism, nationalism, racism and even online hate. There is also selfless help to others, compassion or the problem of Mexican immigrants (Sean and Daniel are half Mexican). Importantly, these stories are skillfully woven into the plot. The creators are not pushy. They present the problems in a subtle way, and leave the commentary to us, in most situations without imposing their own position. We decide how to behave in a particular scene.

All this makes the story of the two brothers poignant, and in many places even overwhelming. Observing the situations they face, we sympathize with them. On the other hand, we are happy when there is a moment of respite, joy or even fun. The plot in many moments, instead of relaxing, forces you to consider the world around us.

Technically, we have a classic gameplay replay. We only control Sean, watching the world from behind his back. Life is Strange 2 is a kind of "self-play". The gameplay consists in exploring subsequent locations, talking to the characters and making important choices.

In many places there are objects scattered around - often completely unrelated to the plot, but interacting with them builds up the story with small details or is simply a moment to relax and joke. There is also an element of fund management - collecting and spending money on needed items (and the temptation of theft), although its potential has not been fully exploited.

After each episode, we again receive a summary of the decisions we have made. We can compare ourselves to other players and learn about alternative plot possibilities. It is also an encouragement to start the story anew - this time with the option of skipping often very long cutscenes.

Studio Dontnod is also unscathed in technical matters. The graphics are not great - in many places you can see a number of shortcomings and lack of details. However, all this is skilfully covered up by the graphic style, which uses pastel colors. So sometimes we have the impression that the image on the screen has been painted.

This works quite well, and some locations even encourage you to stop for a moment and observe the surroundings. There are many more diverse spots than just one. We visit several states here, so we run through forests filled with majestic sequoias, traverse the snow-covered countryside, struggle with the sun in the desert or wander in a grand canyon.

The creators also improved the facial expressions of the characters, although this is still very conventional, and the faces still seem a bit plastic. The soundtrack is good, introducing a nostalgic atmosphere. However, it lacked equally characteristic and well-chosen songs, which the first one was famous for. As for small details, it is worth praising, for example, the ability to adjust the size of the subtitles. It comes in handy when we sit far away from the TV.

Life is Strange 2 is an entirely story-driven game. Life is Strange 2 is a must-have for adventure fans. If you don't mind the practically zero level of difficulty and prefer an engaging and mature story over advanced gameplay, then this is the game for you.

However, Dontnod's work is not devoid of mishaps - mainly manifested in lengthy and less engaging fragments - but overall it is a very solid game that captures the heart with its story, and will also squeeze a few tears from more sensitive people. It's definitely worth giving her a chance. A well-drawn and poignant story about two brothers struggling with adult problems. It will offer several hours of lazy gameplay. Just right for long winter evenings.

Life is Strange: True Colors

In video games, I highly value complex and revolutionary gameplay, which I almost always prefer over graphics or even the story told by the game. For this reason, adventure 3D productions like The Walking Dead from Telltale Games or Detroit: Become Human from Quantic Dream should not appeal to me because of their simple and often repetitive gameplay.

Sometimes, however, I forget about it and lose myself for many hours in some seemingly trivial product in terms of gameplay, which only confirms that sometimes a good storyline with memorable characters can be enough to conquer the market and the hearts of players.

Because you have to say it straight - Life is Strange: True Colors is not a revolution in terms of gameplay in the world of video games, so this title is not very different from its predecessors or even competitors. But the question is… does there really have to be a revolution here?

First of all, let me warn you - in order to briefly introduce you to the plot of Life is Strange: True Colors, I have to enter into light spoilers regarding the first hours of the game, which consists of more or less the entire first chapter of the adventure (there are five of them in the game).

However, this should not spoil the game for you, because the story itself is so extensive that the early events of the game are just the beginning of this whole multi-threaded intrigue.

As it happens in the Life is Strange series, we play the main character endowed with a certain supernatural power. In this case, we step into the shoes of Alex Chen, who, compared to Max Caulfield and Daniel from previous installments of the series, can boast much less spectacular abilities. Alex can only - or as much as - read the emotions of his interlocutors, which, against the background of time manipulation, does not seem to be anything special or interesting.

However, appearances can be deceiving, because Alex's ability also allows her to discover the past of some people and their deeds, which turns out to be very useful in solving the later intrigue. And this one begins right after Alex arrives in her hometown of Haven Springs, where her older brother Gabe lives, who acquaints his sister with a new reality. The girl initially hides her gift, using it only slightly when meeting new friends and their families.

Unfortunately, after the initial idyll, a mysterious tragedy occurs, in which the protagonist's brother dies. Alex pulls herself together fairly quickly after her brother's death and embarks on a private investigation with the help of Gabe's closest friends.

There are a lot of clues here, also suspects, but - as you can probably guess - the ability of our main character turns out to be very helpful in gradually reaching the truth, which is not as simple as it might seem at first.

The above story may not sound too original and there is no denying that similar themes can be found in many other games, books, movies or series. However, Life is Strange: True Colors has the undeniable advantage that the game's script is really well written, which makes it hard to get bored here. There are many unexpected plot twists, characteristic characters and surprises related to Alex's superpower.

On a huge plus, I also include the side stories of other characters that can drag on throughout the entire length of the game and that draw you in. Sometimes really difficult and rarely exploited topics in games are discussed here, such as Alzheimer's disease, alcoholism or following your own ambitions against everything and everyone. The history of the town itself is also very interesting and I was happy to explore all the levels in search of plot collectibles.

All these elements make Life is Strange: True Colors completely addictive and I think it is probably the best written game in the entire series. The first Life is Strange also had a great script, of course, and the story told there was also a pleasure to discover, but True Colors seems to me a bit better written, although it may just be a matter of my taste.

In terms of gameplay, not much has changed in recent years, the lion's share of the game is still cutscenes that push the story forward. From time to time, we are asked to choose one of four dialogue lines or make more significant decisions, such as revealing someone's secret or choosing one of the two sides of the conflict. These more significant choices are presented in the form of static boards that stop the game completely while we decide.

Importantly, our choices (even the smaller ones) have a real impact on the rest of the game, although I note that there are not as huge differences in the plot here as in, for example, Detroit: Become Human, which I will rather not go through again. Life is Strange: True Colors coming soon. In addition to these cutscenes, we also have a lot of fragments of the game in which we explore locations quite freely, talking to supporting characters, completing simple side quests or collecting the previously mentioned collectibles.

Sometimes the game also gives us moments in which we can use the powers of our heroine, which also diversifies the gameplay a bit, although I still see the "core" of the game from the first Life is Strange here. If we get lost at some point in True Colors, we have access to our heroine's smartphone and diary all the time, in which we can find current goals, text messages, boards of a fictional social networking site and a diary.

I appreciate a few attempts to diversify the game, in the form of interesting mini-games in slot machines (I spent a surprisingly long time in these) or a few other side activities. So it's worth not just running at breakneck speed in order to push the main storyline forward, but also slowly explore the world, especially that some optional dialogues or interactions can open new gates in the main storyline.

The gameplay described above does not have any major flaws or shortcomings that would disqualify me from Life is Strange: True Colors at the start. It's just another game based on the same systems and themes as its predecessors, with minor novelties and improvements.

And this is where I see the biggest problem of this production - the lack of major changes in the gameplay, which after three big games have the right to bore some players. And it seems to me that the creators themselves would like to do something more, which can be seen from a few fragments of True Colors.

For example: one of the stages in the game tries to be a bit more creative than the others, changing the rules of the game for a while, in the shape of a kind of jRPG. Unfortunately, although I liked the idea very much, I was very disappointed with its execution. The simple combat model was designed on… the usual dialogue system.

I really regret that at this point the creators did not focus on at least a temporary change of the interface, adding simple life bars or anything else that would make this part of the game stand out from the rest of the stages. Terrible wasted potential of a very interesting idea.

And bugs, I found a lot of those in the latest Life is Strange, although all of them were rather minor and none of them prevented me from continuing the game. I must also give credit to the creators that while playing True Colors, this game received as many as two major updates, which actually had a positive impact on reducing the number of errors.

What caught my attention the most during the first presentations of Life is Strange: True Colors was the graphics, which in the trailers looked very decent. The previous installments were positively distinguished in terms of visuals, but it should be noted that this was mainly due to the artistic side of these productions. Because the technology that powers Life is Strange, Life is Strange: Before the Storm, The Awesome Adventures of Captain Spirit and Life is Strange 2, has never taken the hats off their heads.

Mainly, average animations were lame there, in particular facial expressions, which should be at a very high level in this type of games. And in True Colors, this aspect does not disappoint, although I will immediately point out that there is no "new quality" in video games when it comes to facial animations of the characters. It's just good and finally the characters look the way they should, portraying emotions in the right way, which was probably a bit forced by the main storyline of the game.

The rest of the technical aspects are also hard to fault. The locations are large and full of details, the textures - despite the simple style - also do not scare with their quality, and the play of lights (especially in the bar!) and the models look very good. True Colors is simply a nice game, and finally, it is not only the artistic side of the production that deserves it, but also a solid technical background.

I only have two problems with the graphics. First of all - the lack of 60 frames per second on next-gen consoles is a huge oversight, especially in such a relatively simple game. This is not an open world with huge maps, but a rather linear adventure game that should not have too high requirements. However, as it turns out, even on powerful PCs, achieving a stable 60fps is quite a challenge, so it's clear that something went wrong with the optimization of the latest Life is Strange.

And secondly - ray tracing. When playing on Nextgen or PC, we will find options to enable ray tracing technology in the game settings. The problem is that the difference between ray tracing on and off is very difficult to notice.

Finally, a word about audio, which - as always in this series - does not disappoint on any level. The recorded dialogues are at a very high level, and thanks to the better facial expressions of the characters, they look even better in combination with what we see on the screen.

The music is also a class in itself, we will find here not only original songs created for the game but also licensed songs from, for example, Radiohead, which perfectly match the game's atmosphere.

Because what is most important in the Life is Strange games is also in True Colors - an enjoyable storyline to discover, diverse heroes and a superpower that allows you to spice up the story.

Anti-– mother influencer

 Religious fanaticism, domestic violence and... vlogs from everyday, idyllic life (but only seemingly idyllic). Everything is monetized on Y...