DOES TIME EXIST !?

 The answer to this question may surprise you.

Is it possible to confuse strawberry-flavored kefir for next Thursday?

Is 2 + 2 = RAF aircraft?

What is the evidence that I am walking now, and what evidence is that I am standing at the same moment?

If you consider these three questions to be totally out of the question, please reflect on this article.

Well, during the summer night we go to the pedal boat harbor by the lake near the city center. We walk along the path, we are accompanied by the darkness and lights of nearby street lamps, and the last pedestrians and cyclists pass us. It's warm and we don't know how we'll even get some sleep on this steamy night.

➡️ What is the evidence that I am moving it at all? How to disprove the thesis that everything is static, that is, stationary anyway?

➡️ You can see you changing the movements of your limbs against the background of the passing time. This is what I see and hold on to.

➡️ All right. But as we know, time is an illusion. From minus infinity to the present, up to plus infinity, it is already written by mathematical formulas just like song data is stored on a CD. You as an observer is under the illusion of time-lapse as tracks 1, through 2, 3, 5, 8, and so on are played from this CD. However, when you take the disc out of the playback station, then you have a static, stationary record in your hand.

Additionally, the passage of time resembles a movie. In a cinematic picture, hundreds of thousands of frames, i.e. independent still images, are played from the tape one after the other. The projector displays thousands of still, little different pictures. And that's when you have the illusion of movement, which is the passage of time. In fact, these graphics are stationary.

If you were to imagine an infinitely small period of time, much, much less than one attosecond, as a single frame .. Time is then a complete illusion. Because only the right frame-by-frame movement gives you the impression that you are watching a movie called life.

But seriously, in one cage you have your right leg raised while you are in an illusory run. In the second cage, your leg is even more lifted. Then, on the next ones, that leg starts to droop, and you think you're going. In turn, on many fronts, you simply sit or stand.

So life and the universe are not only a simulation based on mathematical formulas, and then on binary code. But it is also a static (still) simulation where you go, sit and stand in an instant. Only it happens in other frames of the film.

➡️ Ok, but what we see and register with our senses is more important than the quantum superposition you just talked about.

➡️ And here I have you! You put the perspective of the subjective observer over the superposition perspective. So you support our temporal, material subjectivism in which time and space really exist. But what is closer to the truth?

And what do you think about it? Feel free to discuss. 😀